Hi Greg,

Can you please explain why you believe this should go in RPC?

Regards,
Reshad.

From: Greg Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Saturday, February 25, 2017 at 6:48 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Correcting BFD Echo model
Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Reshad 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-Date: Saturday, February 25, 2017 at 6:48 PM

Dear All,
I've reviewed the BFD YANG model and now I'm thinking that 
desired-min-echo-tx-interval and attributing to it the behavior, i.e. when the 
value is 0, of Required Min Echo RX Interval are not in the right place. I 
think that definition of desired transmit interval of BFD Echo should be in 
corresponding RPC definition, not in configuration part of the model.
Appreciate your comments.

Regards,
Greg

Reply via email to