Hi Thibault,
thank you for your interest in the draft, much appreciated. Please don't be
discouraged that it lapsed, we can fix it easily. I think that authors had
similar to your idea when we've started thinking about BFD supporting VRRP.
And like you we haven't found any reference in existing documents, hence
this draft draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd. Would be much obliged if you review and
share your comments, suggestion regarding solutions proposed in the draft.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:20 AM, TABANI Thibault <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am working at improving VRRP convergence time. (target a few 100’s of
> milliseconds)
>
>
>
> It appears that VRRP supports BFD health monitoring which might be a
> better option than tuning VRRP aggressive timers.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately I cannot find any active RFC where VRRP supports BFD. The
> only document I found is your draft document:
>
>
>
> Fast failure detection in VRRP with BFD
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-04
>
>
>
> Unfortunately date expires of this document.  As BFD support for VRRP is
> implemented on most routers, I suppose that an active RFC might exist on
> that specific BFD implementation within VRRP. (new backup advertisement
> messages….peer table….)
>
> br
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thibault TABANI *
> architect Altran Connected Solutions
> Altran France
>
>
> *[image: cid:[email protected]]*
>
>
>
> 1, Impasse Charles Trenet
>
> 44800 Saint-Herblain
> France
>
> Tel. : +33 2 40 67 62 62 <+33%202%2040%2067%2062%2062>
> Mob. : +33 6 79 06 33 63 <+33%206%2079%2006%2033%2063>
> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
> *www.altran.fr <http://www.altran.fr/>*
>
>
>
> [image: Description : Description : cid:[email protected]]
> <http://facebook.com/AltranFrance>[image: Description : Description :
> cid:[email protected]] <http://twitter.com/AltranFrance>[image:
> Description : Description : LinkedIn_signatureMail]
> <http://linkedin.com/company/altran-france>[image: Description :
> Description : pictog_viadeo] <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/company/altran>
>
>
>

Reply via email to