Hi All,
As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR associated
with this draft.
Many thanks,
Colin Docherty
[email protected]
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 00:11 Aditya Dogra (addogra) <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As a co-author of this draft , I am not aware of any IPR associated
> with this draft.
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Aditya Dogra (addogra)
>
>
>
>
>
> From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Chris Bowers <
> [email protected]>
>
> Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 8:44 AM
>
> To: RTGWG <[email protected]>
>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: IPR call for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p
>
>
>
> RTGWG,
>
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p is currently an individual draft. Before
> conducting a poll regarding working group adoption by RTGWG, I would like
> to get responses from the authors and contributors regarding any IPR
> related to this draft.
>
>
>
> First, there is some history associated with this draft that is useful to
> document.
>
>
>
> In June of 2015, draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-00 was published based on the use
> of point-to-point BFD by VRRP.
>
>
>
> In July of 2015, draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case-00 was published
> based on the use of point-to-multipoint BFD by VRRP.
>
>
>
> In October of 2015, after suggestions from the WG, the two drafts above
> were merged into draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.
>
>
>
> In January of 2016, the following IPR was disclosed related to
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/
>
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02 was the current version of draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd
> when this IPR was disclosed.
>
>
>
> In October of 2016, a WG adoption poll was conducted regarding
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd.
>
> There was not consensus to adopt the draft due to IPR concerns. See this
> email for details.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg05729.html
>
>
>
> In August of 2017, draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p-00 was published.
>
>
>
> In October of 2017, a new revision of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case
> (rev-01) was published.
>
>
>
> In December of 2017 (yesterday to be precise), an minor update to
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p was published.
>
>
>
> It is my understanding from discussions with the authors of these drafts,
> both inside and outside of the RTGWG sessions at IETF100, that
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p was written with the goal of separating the
> content of the merged draft back into two separate drafts in such a way
> that the IPR disclosed in https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/ does not
> apply to draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p.
>
>
>
> Having documented that history, I would now like to conduct the usual
> RTGWG process regarding IPR, specifically for IPR related to
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p/
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or contributor to
> draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p, please respond to this email stating whether or
> not you are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p. The
> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
