Apologies for sending it unfinished. Please see below. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Chris, et. al, > I'm co-author of the draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case. In regard to > the IPR related to this draft I'd like to note: > > - I don't know of any IPR other than already disclosed > - per my understanding both disclosures are related to the same IPR > - per my understanding of the existing IPR and the current draft, the > draft has substantial technical difference when comparing to the claims in > the IPR. > > Regards, Greg > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> RTGWG, >> >> draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case is currently an individual draft. >> Before conducting >> a poll regarding working group adoption by RTGWG, I would like to get >> responses from >> the authors and contributors regarding any IPR related to this draft. >> >> There are currently two IPR statements related to this draft: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3133/ >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3135/ >> >> If you are listed as an author or contributor to >> draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case, >> please respond to this email stating whether or not you are aware of >> any IPR that >> applies to draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case. The response needs to be >> sent to the RTGWG mailing list. >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> >> >
