Greg, you've been given timeslots for these.
Note that I've put the 5884 bis topic at the front of the agenda since it
ties into existing WG work.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:58:02PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Jeff, Reshad, et. al,
> thank you for the opportunity to present and discuss new BFD works in
> London. I'd like to propose the following topics:
> - use of BFD Demand mode in BFD over MPLS p2p LSP (based on
> - non-IP encapsulation of BFD control packet over p2mp MPLS LSP (based
> on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd)
> - use of BFD in MPLS-SR (based of draft-mirsky-spring-bfd)
> - use of p2mp BFD over shared-media, e.g. Ethernet, segment (VRRP and
> PIM-SM) (based on draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case and
> - and, last but not least, clarification of BFD bootstrap by LSP ping
> over MPLS p2p LSP and interest in RFC5884bis (based on
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
> > Working Group,
> > BFD has requested a meeting slot for IETF 101 in London. IETF is little
> > over a month away.
> > This is a call for topics for our session. Even if you think you've
> > requested a slot, please respond in thread so all can see the request for
> > discussion on the topic.
> > As is our tradition, please try to reserve requests for timeslots for
> > DISCUSSION, rather than simply a powerpoint update on a diff between two
> > versions of the draft.
> > -- Jeff & Reshad