Greg, you've been given timeslots for these.

Note that I've put the 5884 bis topic at the front of the agenda since it
ties into existing WG work.

-- Jeff

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:58:02PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Jeff, Reshad, et. al,
> thank you for the opportunity to present and discuss new BFD works in
> London. I'd like to propose the following topics:
> 
>    - use of BFD Demand mode in BFD over MPLS p2p LSP (based on
>    draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand);
>    - non-IP encapsulation of BFD control packet over p2mp MPLS LSP (based
>    on  draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd)
>    - use of BFD in MPLS-SR (based of  draft-mirsky-spring-bfd)
>    - use of p2mp BFD over shared-media, e.g. Ethernet, segment (VRRP and
>    PIM-SM) (based on  draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case and
>    draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case)
>    - and, last but not least, clarification of BFD bootstrap by LSP ping
>    over MPLS p2p LSP and interest in RFC5884bis (based on
>    draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify)
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> > Working Group,
> >
> > BFD has requested a meeting slot for IETF 101 in London.  IETF is little
> > over a month away.
> >
> > This is a call for topics for our session.  Even if you think you've
> > requested a slot, please respond in thread so all can see the request for
> > discussion on the topic.
> >
> > As is our tradition, please try to reserve requests for timeslots for
> > DISCUSSION, rather than simply a powerpoint update on a diff between two
> > versions of the draft.
> >
> > -- Jeff & Reshad
> >
> >

Reply via email to