RTGWG, The authors of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case have requested that RTGWG adopt this draft as a WG document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case/
Please indicate whether or not you support adoption of the draft as a WG document. An explanation of why or why not is also very helpful. The two authors have already indicated that they know of no relevant IPR other than what has already been disclosed. The draft has two IPR disclosures. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3133/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3135/ For some history related to this draft, please see: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg06572.html For information about IPR in IETF technology, see RFC 8179. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8179/ Note that one of the basic principles regarding how the IETF deals with IPR claims (from RFC 8179) is that: "The IETF will make no determination about the validity of any particular IPR claim." Since Jeff Tantsura is a co-author, he will not be involved in judging consensus. The closing date for this poll is Friday, July 6th. Thanks, Chris
