Hi Linda, thank you for the review and your kind words, much appreciated. If an end-point during the p2mp BFD session never responded to the head's multicast poll it is unknown to the head and cannot be reported as "inactive tail". I can imagine that if the head has been given the list of the tails, then the unresponsive end-point can be reported as "inactive tails".
Regards, Greg On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-?? > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2018-06-28 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-18 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-07-05 > > Summary: clear writing of the procedure. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Are End points that not responding considered "Inactive Tails"? Does the > HeadEnd report the "Inactive Tails"? > > Linda Dunbar > > >
