Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you. I also had a few minor nits: Nits: Section 1: "The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) Network Management Datastore Architecture [RFC8342]. " The Department of Redundancy Department called and wants some of their words back please :-) Section 2: "Since BFD is used for liveliness detection of various forwarding paths, there is no uniform key to identify a BFD session. So the BFD data model is split in multiple YANG modules where each module corresponds to one type of forwarding path." I think this would be more readable as: "... to identify a BFD session, and so the BFD..." (hey, I said it was a nit)
