Looks good to me. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA [email protected]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Donald, > thank you for the thorough review, the most detailed and pointed comments > (received the editorial comments already). > I'd like to propose an update to the 2nd paragraph (see below in-line). Hope > it addresses your concern. > > All the editorial suggestions have been accepted and updates applied > accordingly. > > Attached please find the diff with the new working version of the draft. > > Best regards, > Greg > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have reviewed this draft and have two main suggestions: >> >> There appears to be some conflict between the 2nd paragraph of Section >> 1 and the 4th paragraph. Paragraph 2 talks about layer 2 and 3 >> underlay while the 4th paragraph implies only layer 3. > > OLD TEXT: > The VXLAN segments/overlay > networks are overlaid on top of these Layer 2 or Layer 3 networks. > NEW TEXT: > The VXLAN segments/overlays > are overlaid on top of Layer 3 network. > >> >> Also, I recommend that a request (template, RFC 7042) for assignment >> of a MAC address as mentioned in the IANA Considerations section be >> submitted now or at least soon. A single MAC address is cheap and >> requires only Expert approval which I think would be forthcoming. >> >> I have additional minor editorial suggestions I have sent directly to >> the authors. >> >> Preferably with my suggestions incorporated :-) I think this draft is >> ready for WG Last Call. >> >> Thanks, >> Donald >> =============================== >> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >> 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA >> [email protected]
