Dear All, in the new section, Operational Considerations <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-12#section-5>, we've described the use of LSP Ping with BFD Reverse Path TLV is described for scenarios of planned and unexpected changes of the FEC to which the reverse direction of a BFD session is tied. We believe that with this update all outstanding technical comments have been addressed.
Regards, Geg On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:12 PM Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mach, et al., > again, thank you for organizing the discussion. I've searched through my > mailbox and the most recent comments went only to MPLS and BFD WGs chairs, > not in WGs archives. Perhaps the discussion thread can still be found as > "Status of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed". > In response to Carlos questions, in the new update of the draft > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed/>, we've > added the new section, Operational Considerations. There the use of LSP > Ping with BFD Reverse Path TLV is described for scenarios of planned and > unexpected changes of the FEC to which the reverse direction of a BFD > session is tied. > I think that addresses all the outstanding comments. > > Regards, > Greg > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:49 PM Mach Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> The MPLS BFD directed draft ( >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-11 ) has been >> there for a long time. There were quite a lot of discussions between Greg >> and Carlos. The draft has been updated several time to address Carlos's >> comment. Seems there still are some unaddressed comments. Can we find a >> time during the Montreal meeting to discuss the unaddressed comments? And >> hopefully we could find a way to progress the draft. >> >> Since this draft is related to both MPLS and BFD, both working group >> chairs are welcome to join the discussion. >> >> See you in Montreal! >> >> Best regards, >> Mach >> >
