Hi Reshad,
I support this draft to be published, it provides a simple and elegant extension for BFD to verify path MTU. By the way, if further we'd like to achieve a fine-grained process control while using BFD to verfiy or detect path MTU, with the cost of a more complex extention to BFD, then draft-mirmin-bfd-extended potentially can provide such a solution. Best Regards, Xiao Min 原始邮件 发件人：ReshadRahman(rrahman) <rrah...@cisco.com> 收件人：rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; 日 期 ：2019年09月09日 23:14 主 题 ：Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets BFD WG, reminder that WGLC is ongoing for this document. Regards, Reshad. From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrah...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 12:34 PM To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org> Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets BFD WG, As was mentioned at IETF105, this document is stable and there was an interop test done between FRR and Junos VMX. Please provide comments/feedback on the document. The deadline for last call is September 13th. Regards, Reshad & Jeff.
