Hi Gyan, thank you for your interest in this draft. We've described how RFC 8562 BFD for Multipoint Networks <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8562/> can be used to shorten convergence in PIM-SM. The similar scenario discussed in draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/> where p2mp BFD is used by tails to detect the failure of the head/root or the multicast tree. If it is required for the head/root to detect a defect of the multicast tree toward a tail, we'll turn to RFC 8563 BFD for Multipoint Active Tails <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8563/> as in draft-hu-bier-bfd <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-bier-bfd/>. Hope this information would be helpful to you. I always welcome your questions.
Regards, Greg On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:40 PM Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > Greg > > I saw your draft on PIM BFD use cases but could not find the RFC on PIM > BFD. > > > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-02.html > > Thanks > > Gyan > Verizon Communications > Cell-301 502-1347 > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:53 PM, Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > BFD WG > > Anyone know what the RFC or draft for PIM BFD support. > > Thank you > > Gyan > Verizon Communications > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >
