Hi Mirja, my apologies for the delayed response and inaccurate reference to my response to Olivier's comments. I've responded to his comments on June 17th with this email https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/yCJ3ItIjT5j5rSgrargnQM-Sx-0. Please let me know if I've missed to address, through two updates to the document, any of Olivier's comments.
Regards, Greg On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:13 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I also saw that you replied to Carlos comments but I don’t think I saw a > reply to Olivier’s initial mail. The link you’ve sent below seems also a > link to one of Carlos replies. > > See here for Olivier’s review: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07-tsvart-lc-bonaventure-2019-05-31/ > > Mirja > > > > > On 10. Dec 2019, at 17:41, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Mirja and Olivier, > > I apologize that some of Olivier's comments were not addressed. I've > responded to Olivier's detailed comments in > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/?q=Tsvart%20last%20call. > I much appreciate your help in identifying the remaining questions and > comments. > > > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the > TSV-ART > > review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I > don't > > think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be > good! > > > > This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not > specify > > any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a > > document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any > additional > > information about why this doc is PS. > > > > > >
