Hi Santosh, Thanks for addressing the comments.
General: NULL authentication TLV is still used, should be replaced with NULL authentication type or section as appropriate. Be consistent for Null v/s NULL (NULL Auth is used in bfd-optimizing-authentication) Introduction s/detect lost packet/detect lost packets/ Section 3 Use Cases: s/any BFD packet loss if loss/any BFD packet loss if the loss/ s/BFD implementation/BFD implementations/ Where the text says “failure of a link”, might be better to say “failure of a datapath”? Informative references to CFM and TWAMP would be useful Section 4 “by appending the Null-Authentication type “. Suggest “by appending an authentication section with the NULL Authentication type “ Section 5 “BFD uses authentication TLV”, suggest change to “BFD uses an authentication section”. “BFD packets MUST include NULL-Auth TLV”. Change to “BFD control packets MUST include an authentication section with the NULL Authentication type” Section 5.1 “The first BFD NULL-Auth type processed by the receiver…”. Change to “The first BFD authentication section with the NULL Authentication type, in a valid BFD control packet, processed by the receiver” . Also, does it have to be NULL Auth, I believe it can be any auth with sequence number? If that’s the case change to “The first BFD authentication section with a non-zero sequence number, in a valid BFD control packet, processed by the receiver is used for….”. Regards, Reshad. From: Rtg-bfd <[email protected]> on behalf of Santosh P K <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, July 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt Hello All, A new version of draft for BFD-stablity is here for review. Changes include addressing shepherd comments as provided here. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/shepherdwriteup/. Please also see attached diff. Thanks Santosh P K ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 4:41 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt To: Mach Chen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ankur Saxena <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Peng Fan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ashesh Mishra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Santosh Pallagatti <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Santosh Pallagatti and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-bfd-stability Revision: 06 Title: BFD Stability Document date: 2020-07-13 Group: bfd Pages: 6 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-stability Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06 Abstract: This document describes extensions to the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) protocol to measure BFD stability. Specifically, it describes a mechanism for detection of BFD packet loss. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>. The IETF Secretariat
