On 26/11/2021 16:08, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
[Largely for the WG mail list archive.]
On Nov 26, 2021, at 7:26 AM, t petch <[email protected]> wrote:
On 15/10/2021 20:18, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
I encourage the Working Group to review the draft and the comments to date.
After resolving them, I believe we're ready to have a shepherd writeup and
send this to the IESG.
Jeff
My comments from 28oct21 and thereabouts, some of which were first made in
August 2020, have not been addressed (or are being ignored:-(
I still have your comments queued up as "must be addressed before we ship the
document". And, if you'll check your inbox, you should find some edits form Reshad
that will address most of those. Please review and Reshad can post them for broader WG
review.
It's not unusual for IETF to have extra latency this time of year. I've even
given a presentation on the the timing impacts of the last few months during
IETF WG chairs training on project management. :-)
While this is moving about as fast as an attempt to reach the far end of a
hallway during an IETF cookie break, please have some patience. We want to
make sure your comments are addressed.
Jeff,
As I said, I just go on making the comments! I have not seen a -08 but
as I said, I do like seeing the announcement on I-D Announce - that is
what triggers me to act (eventually). At the other end of the spectrum
is Github - I used to get 'cannot display the webpage' whereas now I get
(courtesy of updated security software) 'this website is dangerous - do
not go there' which suits my way of working (albeit I do not see that as
a factor here!).
Tom Petch
-- Jeff
