SGTM.
    On Wednesday, February 8, 2023, 12:59:13 PM EST, John Scudder 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Hi Everyone,

I plan to verify this in the near future (let’s say, Monday Feb 13) unless 
anyone objects. 

Thanks,

—John

> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:27 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880,
> "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7240__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DSW_aH2n7cYViXw08rr41mmdkcad5rzUky6aMWE1XW-uhZqqdIELlYuLQ20Sw8Z1cTiyiqHvd7VyqUJIsm_Lmg$
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 6.8.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>  bfd.LocalDiag
> 
>      The diagnostic code specifying the reason for the most recent
>      change in the local session state.  This MUST be initialized to
>      zero (No Diagnostic).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> [Proposed text]
> 
>  bfd.LocalDiag
> 
>      The diagnostic code specifying the reason for the most recent
>      change in the local session state.  This MUST be initialized to
>      zero (No Diagnostic).  It MUST also be re-initialized to zero
>      (No Diagnostic) when the local session state transitions to Up.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> RFC 5880 at various points calls out setting the value of bfd.LocalDiag as 
> part of state transitions.  The text defining the feature calls for it to be 
> initialized to zero.  However, it doesn't define under what conditions it 
> should be re-initialized to zero.
> 
> One possible place where it may be reinitialized is when the session 
> transitions back to Up, indicating that prior issues may have been cleared.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-base-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title              : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
> Publication Date    : June 2010
> Author(s)          : D. Katz, D. Ward
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party    : IESG

  

Reply via email to