For whatever reason, Raj's attestation didn't make it into the BFD archives. So, a resend.
-- Jeff > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Raj Chetan Boddireddy <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo WGLC and IPR check > Date: April 11, 2023 at 9:18:59 AM EDT > To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Cc: rtg-bfd WG <[email protected]> > > I am not aware of any IPR disclosures applicable to this document. > > Thanks & Regards, > Raj Chetan > > From: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Monday, 10 April 2023 at 8:57 PM > To: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: rtg-bfd WG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo WGLC and IPR check > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!EjoTAw5NjwurOf5C-nX-pWzjHov0h8Td00L8sN39lR8wetMhrXZfgZTsZS2NfFYGjcUnIkmvwmVB$ > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!EjoTAw5NjwurOf5C-nX-pWzjHov0h8Td00L8sN39lR8wetMhrXZfgZTsZS2NfFYGjcUnIkmvwmVB$> > > Working Group, > > The Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo has > completed. My judgment is that it has weak, but positive support to proceed > to publication. This isn't atypical of BFD work at this point in the BFD > Working Group's life. > > The next steps for the document: > > 1. Please continue to iterate through the issues raised during last call. I > will be summarizing them in the original WGLC thread. I suspect we can reach > conclusion for them shortly. > > 2. Each of the authors needs to make an attestation as to whether they're > aware of any additional IPR applicable to this document. The rest of the > Working Group, as per BCP 78/79[1] should also disclose of any applicable IPR > if they're aware of it. > > One thing that makes this document particularly interesting is that this work > is covered partially under work done in BBF in TR-146. This will be noted in > the shepherd writeup. > > > -- Jeff > > [1] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179.html*section-5.1__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!EjoTAw5NjwurOf5C-nX-pWzjHov0h8Td00L8sN39lR8wetMhrXZfgZTsZS2NfFYGjcUnIlbXqmPa$ > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179.html*section-5.1__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!EjoTAw5NjwurOf5C-nX-pWzjHov0h8Td00L8sN39lR8wetMhrXZfgZTsZS2NfFYGjcUnIlbXqmPa$> > > > Juniper Business Use Only >
