On Jan 17, 2024, at 11:23 AM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Alternatively, if the ISAAC page is maintained with the sequence number no > matter what on the presumption that we will eventually move back to ISAAC, > there's no issues. > > Noting that we do not have procedure to permit a new seed to be exchanged as > the limiting factor causing the above is appropriate justification.
OK. I'll add some text and push it back. Alan DeKok.
