Regarding the grouping for pdu-size, that would also be helpful for BFD
clients to include it (if needed) in their config model.
Regards,Reshad.
On Friday, March 29, 2024, 01:32:21 PM EDT, Reshad Rahman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Jeff, Albert,
Thank you for the doc update. With work travel and the email flurry on
optimized authentication, this one slipped through.
On the YANG model, I believe the replicated portion with leaf pdu-size etc
should be a grouping.
I was also thinking that some extra operational data would be useful. I haven't
given much thought to it, and I don't know if you have, but something along the
lines of pdu-size of received BFD packets.
Section 4.1, I think it's worth stating that if padding is enabled on a session
which is up, the session will go down if the peer does not support large BFD
packets.
A security section for the YANG is needed, and the impact of setting leaf
pdu-size (as stated above).
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, January 30, 2024, 03:13:03 PM EST, Jeffrey Haas
<[email protected]> wrote:
Working Group,
After a fumble in -04, -05 updates -03's republish earlier this week with a
YANG module to configure the padded size.
Comments are appreciated. YANG doctor review will be getting requested as
we hopefuly move this forward soon.
-- Jeff and Albert
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:09:02PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05.txt is now available. It is a
> work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) WG of the IETF.
>
> Title: BFD Encapsulated in Large Packets
> Authors: Jeffrey Haas
> Albert Fu
> Name: draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05.txt
> Pages: 12
> Dates: 2024-01-30
>
> Abstract:
>
> The Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) protocol is commonly
> used to verify connectivity between two systems. BFD packets are
> typically very small. It is desirable in some circumstances to know
> that not only is the path between two systems reachable, but also
> that it is capable of carrying a payload of a particular size. This
> document discusses thoughts on how to implement such a mechanism
> using BFD in Asynchronous mode.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
