Likewise. Not aware of any changes past last disclosure. I agree with Mahesh that the original IPR may or may not still be applicable. That’s something for people with better legal understanding than me.
*Ashesh Mishra* Head of Client Solutions +1 (213) 300-0156 www.aalyria.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:04 PM Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote: > I am also not aware of any IPRs. > > Cheers, Manav > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:29 AM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since I'm now an author on optimizing authentication: I'm not aware of >> any applicable IPR. >> >> -- Jeff >> >> >> On Jun 3, 2024, at 9:29 PM, Reshad Rahman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> BFD WG, >> >> This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for the following 3 >> documents, please review and provide comments by end of day on June 17th. >> Feedback such as "I believe the document is ready to advance" is also >> welcome. >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers/ >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication/ >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/ >> >> >> Those documents were discussed extensively a few years ago but there have >> been a few changes since (e.g. use of ISAAC). >> >> IPR check was done a few years ago but it's been a while and there has >> been significant changes in the documents since then: >> 1- Authors, please respond whether you are aware of any undisclosed IPR. >> 2- Mahesh, Ankur and Ashesh, is this IPR >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3328/> still relevant/applicable to >> draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication? >> >> >> Regards, >> Reshad. >> >> >> >> >> >>
