Roman, On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 06:24:10AM -0700, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (For the BFD WG chairs and responsible AD) This document does not appear to be > in scope of the charter (version -08). The current charter identifies 7 > specific topics (numbers 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3, 4, and 5), none of which appear to > cover this document.
We also completed work on a YANG module, approved by the IESG, that wasn't in charter. BFD work is being done outside of the BFD working group by various protocol extensions. Are those drafts chartered? More directly, it's known that charters are stale. Is this *really* the point you want to use as a DISCUSS and will an audit of things you've approved show that you've consistently applied that evaluation criteria? I suggest you reconsider the position filed as a COMMENT. As already discussed (lower-case d) with the routing area directors, BFD is largely wrapping up the few pieces of lingering work it's doing. The decision is not to shut down the group, but to hibernate it. A charter update as part of that is appropriate. -- Jeff
