Hi John, Thank you for your expedient clarification. Of course, I will wait for that discussion.
Regards, Greg On Fri, Oct 18, 2024, 14:37 John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I anticipate we will have a more complete charter review in the fairly > near future, and these questions and comments would be appropriate for that > review. I request that you defer them until then, if that’s OK. > > My intention with this minor recharter is that it be tightly scoped to > specific items for the adopted WG drafts that weren’t already covered in > the charter. > > Thanks, > > —John > > On Oct 18, 2024, at 5:29 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > Hi John, > thank you for sharing the updates on the BFD WG charter. I have a few > questions: > > - it seems that in addition to the fault detection in a network, BFD > is aimed for "liveness detection". While the fault detection is well-known > process, I cannot find the definition of "liveness detection" or "liveness" > in IETF documents. Coult it be interpreted as, for example, "path > continuity"? > - several action points are related to MIB work. How useful is MIB BFD > these days? Would directing the work on BFD management to the BFD YANG > model be a better choice? > > Regards, > Greg > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:35 PM John Scudder via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-bfd-08-00: Yes >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bfd/ >> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bfd/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FN9wd521P-SJGMGZNb1dy4BElfEbYGwCpcrc8HIycxZgoqomWXTX1h-SWv-HALSrXTEb4zog3TpAzJBNEQ$> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I think we can skip external review since this is a minor update, but I >> forgot >> to click the right box. :-( >> >> >> >>
