BFD WG,
At IETF120 the BFD chairs discussed with the ADs the concern of lack of
feedback during WGLC on these 3 documents. On one hand, I was uncomfortable
declaring WG consensus. OTOH delaying/preventing the work from being published,
when so much effort had been put by the authors/WG. Finally, although there are
no known implementations, the techniques in those documents could be very
useful in the future.
So the decision was made to progress these documents as experimental. BFD
stability was already experimental, the 2 others were changed to experimental
but the diffs are minor. Thanks to Mahesh for making the changes.
Comments/suggestions/objections by November 15th. After that I'll start on the
shepherd write-ups.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-stability/
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, July 9, 2024 at 12:58:08 PM EDT, Reshad Rahman
<[email protected]> wrote:
BFD WG,
Thanks to the authors for addressing the various comments.
However, WGLC has been inconclusive due to a lack of comments from the WG,
therefore we can not move forward with these documents at this point.
Regards,Reshad.
