Jeff, Thanks for the super-fast reaction and the -14, which addresses most of the points below (I am also unclear about Jürgen’s points tbh, I hoped that you would know more).
The I-D has been added on the first available telechat agenda: Thursday 9th of January 2025 (yes, the IESG is also “closed” during end of year...) Regards -éric From: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 9 December 2024 at 17:44 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Next steps after IETF Last Call of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets Éric, On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:51:51PM +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > Jeff, Albert, and BFD WG, > > The IETF Last Call of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-13 has concluded today. > Before putting the I-D on the IESG telechat for the IESG evaluation, I need > you to reply/act (read a revised I-D) for: > > * The IANA recent comments (a copy of the email is below), some text > needs to be added in the IANA considerations section (whatever the > authors/WG’s answer is) Addressed in 14. > * The YANG DOCTORS’ review[1] and Jeff’s proposed clarification text > should be in a revised I-D. I'm unclear what remaining point remains from Jürgen's review. Please clarify. > I have read the conversation about the GENART review [2] and Dan, the GENART > reviewer, being satisfied with the conversation. So, all is good. 14 covers the nits. > > There were no other reviews during the IETF Last Call. > > Please submit a revised I-D for the 2 above points and I will put this > document on the IESG formal telechat > > Regards > > -éric > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/w5NaiyfytTJfv57lqzC2qvtpwsc/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/uxlxsDXTE2zvlCAZMnIl9-mqUGI/ -- Jeff
