How about: The addition of dynamic size packets adds the potential for leaks in the padding. The padding requirements in this document are the mitigation for these issues.
Although it is two sentences. Still pretty short and clear. Deb On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 9:23 AM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Add what sentence? There is no concrete suggestion and Brian has failed > to reply to the thread. > > > > -- Jeff > > > > On Jan 7, 2025, at 9:04 AM, Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Section 6, Security Considerations: As both Brian Trammell and Joe > Salowey > > suggest, please add a sentence for implementers to take care when there > are > > dynamic packet sizes. Also add a link to the BFD RFC (RFC 5880). > > > > > >
