Hi all,

Our draft basically describes a data forwarding mechanism, currently
specified for 6lowpan (but it would be doable to add the same mechanism for
IP as well). The idea is that a node first tries to forward a data packet
along the route proposed by the routing protocol. However, if the topology
has changed or a link has become very unstable, instead of dropping the
packet, the node tries to find alternate paths towards the destination by
applying a "depth-first search" in the network, possibly updating the route
cost in the routing protocol. This allows for increasing the delivery ratio
until the route has been corrected by the routing protocol. The advantage
is that one requires fewer updates of the control plane, which may have
negative effects on an already unstable topology (e.g. by flooding RREQ or
LSAs).
We have done a number of simulations and also real tests with several
hundred nodes at Fujitsu which showed a performance improvement. If you are
interested in reading the draft, I would appreciate any kind of feedback.

I-D
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cardenas-dff

We have code both for the real testbed and for the simulator. Moreover, I
am currently developing open source code.

Some results in a paper (not yet available, but I will see if I can spin
out a research report and upload that somewhere with public access)
*Comparison of Data Forwarding Mechanisms for AMI Networks.* Sandra
Céspedes, Alvaro A. Cárdenas, Tadashige Iwao. 2012 IEEE Innovative Smart
Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT). January 17-19, 2012.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Dear all,
>
> In the FRR discussion at the mike today, I indicated that some work
> targeting FRR in LLNs might be worth looking at (and/or bring it into this
> wg).
>
> The draft I mentioned was this:
>
>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cardenas-dff-03
>
> I'm not an author of this I-D, but I Cc Ulrich, who is, and who can
> probably say something much more intelligently than I can about it.
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Thomas Heide Clausen
> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>
> "Payload (noun): wasted bandwidth between headers" (C.Lavenu 2011)
>
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to