In message <[email protected]>
Kireeti Kompella writes:
 
> On May 24, 2012, at 10:56 , Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>  
> > In the discussion of the CL framework, a suggestion was made to change
> > the requirements.  Please comment on this suggestion.
> > 
> > The following would be added somewhere.
> > 
> >  Load balancing MAY be used during sustained low traffic periods to
> >  reduce the number of active component links for the purpose of power
> >  reduction.
>  
> Is the intent:
>  
>    Load balancing MAY be _changed_ during sustained low traffic
>    periods to reduce the number of active component links ...
>  
> ?
>  
> If so, a warning ("this may result in some packets being reordered,
> and a change in delay and jitter of some flows") should probably be
> added.
>  
> Kireeti.


Kireeti,

You are correct that any change would be minimally disruptive.  In the
example I gave there could be no more than one change in 20 minutes,
but still more than zero.

I personally don't think a warning is needed here, but if you and/or
others feel it is needed I have no objections to adding it.  The text
would then be:

  [FR#N]   Load balancing MAY be used during sustained low traffic
           periods to reduce the number of active component links for
           the purpose of power reduction.

  As with any load balancing change, a change initiated for the
  purpose of power reduction may be minimally disruptive.  Typically
  the disruption is limited to a change in delay characteristics and
  the potential for a very brief period with traffic reordering.  The
  network operator when configuring a network for power reduction
  should weight the benefit of power reduction against the
  disadvantage of a minimal disruption.

The first paragraph is a requirement.  The second paragraph is
discussion and should not appear within a numbered list of
requirements.

I would like comments from you and others.  Do we need to add this
requirement?  If so do we need to add this warning?

Curtis
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to