>From the discussion and poll on the list, it is clear that there is good support for adopting draft-shand-remote-lfa as an RTGWG draft.
There was also very good feedback about the need for further details on the applicability and coverage of this method - as it pertains to node protection, prefix protection, and two-way traffic protection. Authors, could you please republish the current version of draft-shand-remote-lfa as draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-00 and then update the draft to respond to the feedback? Thanks, Alia _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
