As a reminder, having an IPR claim does not disqualify a draft from advancing in the IETF, being adopted by a working group or from eventually becoming a standard. It just represents one more item to be considered by the working group.
http://www.ietf.org/ipr/policy.html To help in the evaluation, the following link is to the patent application itself (provided by the authors): http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010055408&recNum=1&docAn=IB2009007467&queryString=FP:%28PCT/IB2009/007467%29&maxRec=1 As a chair, my job is to remind the WG of the IETF policy -- the decision of whether we should continue to work on this item is to be made by the individuals participating in the WG. Because the concern expressed by Curtis has come up several times (from different people), including at the meeting in Taipei, I would like to hear other opinions specific to the impact of the terms of the IPR filing with respect to the architecture proposed. Thanks! Alvaro. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Curtis Villamizar > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: IPR Disclosure: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s > Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture-01 > > > In message <[email protected]> > IETF Secretariat writes: > > > > > Dear Gabor Sandor Envedi, Alia Atlas, Robert Kebler, Andras Csaszar, > > Russ White, Mike Shand, Maciek Konstantynowicz: > > > > An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "An > > Architecture for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute Using Maximally Redundant Trees" > > (draft- ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture) was submitted to the IETF > > Secretariat on 2012-06-18 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of > > Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/). The title of the IPR > > disclosure is "Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement > > about IPR related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture-01.""); > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > Prior reasons to be hesitant about this work included the rather > substantial change to routing and forwarding, and the need to deploy > network wide (no accommodation for legacy equipment). Regardless, it > became a WG item. > > Now that there is an IPR disclosure with no statement at all regarding > licensing terms, it might be time to reconsider whether the WG should > go forward with this work. > > IMHO- If the IPR disclosure is not updated with a reasonable and > non-discriminatory, preferably royalty-free, licensing statement, the > MRT work should be abandoned by RTGWG. > > Curtis > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
