Dear Eric,

Forgot to answer question number one.

As far as operator support is concerned we will be familiarizing this as we
go along with the major ISPs and seeking their opinion.

Some informal conversations have shown the power reduction techniques are
necessary more than ever.

At this stage we are not even asking for standardization but just to convey
the fact that we did some simulations and the work was a result of these
experiments. The conference calls that we had with some providers with huge
opex costs with respect to power especially core routers of the kind that
are deployed today helped us gather more material from this research-y yet
technically feasible solution.

The mechanism proposed is primarily a PCE like architecture that constructs
the graph with weighted edges as consumed power to available bandwidth
ratios and which runs CSPF to do its job as proposed.

Hope this clarifies.

thanks and regards,
balaji venkat

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Eric Osborne (eosborne) <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Some comments:
>
> 1)  This is clearly a cut and paste of an academic paper, as your
> Acknowledgements indicate.  This sort of stuff rarely goes anywhere in the
> IETF as the IETF is not a research journal.  To move towards
> standardization you'd need support from one or more operators stating that
> the problem you solve is  a real problem for them, and that your solution
> is both effective and deployable in practice.  Note that this support has
> more heft if it comes from the operations side, not from the research
> department.  Do you have such support?
>
> 2) Your document assumes massive amounts of cooperation between ASes,
> including inter-AS TE LSPs.  You may want to investigate the operational
> feasibility of this cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>
> eric
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of Balaji venkat Venkataswami
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:10 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Shankar Raman M J; Gaurav Raina
> > Subject: Discussion on draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We would like the working group members opinion and comments on the
> > following draft.
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-03
> >
> > Please feel free to comment on the same.
> >
> > thanks and regards,
> > balaji venkat
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to