Hi Cutis,

The change is fine. Agree that the LC is completed.

Thanks,
Lucy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:59 PM
> To: Lucy yong
> Cc: Alia Atlas; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirements-09
> 
> 
> In message <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D452399E1@dfweml509-
> mbx.china.huawei.com>
> Lucy yong writes:
> 
> > One comment as one of co-authors.
> >
> > Suggest to change the title to "requirements for a composite link in
> > MPLS network". This will make consistent with the title in the
> > framework doc.
> >
> > Lucy
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Alia Atlas
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:42 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirements-09
> >
> > This is to start a working group last call on
> > draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirements-09.  The WGLC will conclude on March
> > 15; extra time is given to include the IETF meeting.
> >
> > Please read and send comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alia & Alvaro
> 
> 
> 
> Lucy,
> 
> This is the second and only remaining comment in the last call.  Sorry
> I missed replying to this.  The request is to change the title.  If
> you don't mind making CLs and networks plural in the title then:
> 
>   OLD
> 
>     Requirements for MPLS Over a Composite Link
> 
>   NEW
> 
>     Requirements for Composite Links in MPLS Networks
> 
> I just made this change since it seems non-controversial and it seems
> to me to be a better title.
> 
> The only other change was requested by Alia and that was removing the
> sentence "Current practice related to multipath is described briefly
> in an appendix." from the abstract (that appendix is now in the use
> cases document).
> 
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10 has been posted.
> 
> If there are no objections to the title change, then the WG chairs can
> conclude the last call.
> 
> Curtis
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to