Hi!
I've just realized a small typo in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01.
In Sec. 2.2, in Figure 2 the path from PE1 to PEx is
*R9-R8-R7-R10-R6-PEx*, however, the text below the figure says:
"In the figure 2, let us consider the traffic coming from PE1 to PEx.
Nominal path is *R9-R8-R7-R6-PEx*" -> R10 is missing.
Every other things seem correct :)
Regards,
Levente
On 04/23/2013 12:48 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
Hi!
The period for comments has ended.
We received 11 comments supporting the adoption, which included 2 of
the 3 contributors and 3 of the 4 authors. Given that and the support
at the last meeting, there is consensus to adopt the work.
Also, all the authors and contributors have confirmed that they are
not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Authors: Please republish the draft with the updated name
draft-rtgwg-lfa-manageability.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On 4/2/13 1:17 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!
The authors of 'Operational management of Loop Free Alternates'
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01)
have requested that rtgwg adopt their draft as a WG document.
Authors and Contributors: Please respond indicating whether or not
you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not progress
until we have received a response from each author/contributor.
Please send any comments to the list by April 16, 2013.
Thanks!!
Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
