Hi, Question to the authors of the draft about their intentions, obviously the basic node protection equation(D_opt(Npq, Dst) < D_opt(Npq, Np) + Distance_opt(Np, Dst)) is correct, however the rest is more or less implementation details. So if the authors would like to share the details about their implementation should not the Intended Status be Informational?
Cheers, Jeff >> >>>Folks, >>> >>>Does anyone know whether the draft deal will be treated in the IETF 88? >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Rogerio Mariano >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>View this message in context: >>>http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/Request-for-review-draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa >>>- >>>n >>>ode-protection-01-txt-tp375714p386321.html >>>Sent from the IETF - Rtgwg mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>_______________________________________________ >>>rtgwg mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >> > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
