I did that on Sept 13. Alia
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> wrote: > Alia, > > We should send a heads up to MPLS and CCAMP. Would you please do that as > WG chair. > > Curtis > > > Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> > Sent from my tablet so please disregard sloppy typing. > > > Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > > This second WG Last Call got absolutely no comments. > Does this group of generally opinionated and thoughtful people truly have > nothing to say? > If so and given the previous WGLC succeeded, then on Oct 9, I will take > silence as consent and indicate that on the draft shepherd's write-up... > > Alia > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is to start a second Working Group Last Call on >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-11. As you may recall, we successfully >> completed a WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10. After that, >> there was concern about the use of ITU terminology (composite-link and NPO) >> where the draft was not actually using the exact meaning specified by the >> ITU. >> >> Therefore, it was decided to return the draft to the WG for a quick >> terminology update (and also to address some other review comments). >> >> This WGLC will end on September 30. >> >> Thanks, >> Alia >> > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
