Please note Cisco declared IPR on RFC 5715 section 6.1
- Stewart
On 22/10/2013 10:20, Mike Shand wrote:
So you have described the difference with OFIB (RFC 6976), but how
does your proposal differ from "incremental cost advertisement" as
described in RFC 5715 section 6.1?
Mike
On 22/10/2013 04:39, Yangang wrote:
OK, I got it.
Actually, we pay attention to two point:
1. Which method will be more nicety? In RFC6976, all devices in
network need calculate the schedule time, base on the different
hardware and environment, we worry about its effect. In our draft,
only failure point adjust the cost, the other device just response
the cost change. I think the effect of this kind of difference will
be less.
2. Due to no new extension, maybe the distribution will be more
smoothly.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2013年10月22日 9:42
收件人: Yangang
抄送: [email protected]; Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)
主题: Re: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on
draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
I'm aware of the basic premise of the two drafts and was not asking
for you to restate the obvious. Specifically, what are the benefits
and determents of your draft when compared to RFC 6976?
Acee
On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Yangang wrote:
Our draft is similar with section 6.1 in RFC5715, the cost of
changed link will be adjusted and advertised, maybe more than one
time, this sequence will base on some pre-calculations. But in RFC
6976, each device should calculate the distance with the failue
link, base on this distance, each device decide when the FIB will be
updated.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2013年10月21日 10:07
收件人: Yangang
抄送: [email protected]; Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)
主题: Re: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on
draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Can you contrast this with RFC 6976? You include RFC 6976 in the
Normative References but it is never referenced (this will show up
if you run idnits).
Acee
On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Yangang wrote:
Hi:
We had submitted the a new draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00,
we want to discuss the micro-loop problem through another method.
Your feedback and comments on the rtgwg mailing list are appreciated.
Thanks,
Rahul.Yan
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2013年10月18日 15:47
收件人: Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP); Yangang
主题: New Version Notification for
draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Xudong Zhang and posted to the
IETF repository.
Filename: draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
Revision: 00
Title: Algorithm for Ordered Metric Adjustment
Creation date: 2013-10-18
Group: Individual Submission
Number of pages: 10
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
Status:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
Abstract:
Upon link down event or link up event, each device in network
individually schedules route calculation. Because of different
hardware capabilities and internal/external environments, the
time to
update forwarding entries on these devices are disordered which can
cause a transient forwarding loop. This document introduces a
method
to prevent forwarding loop by adjusting link metric gradually for
several times.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
