Yes, pretty much. 

On Nov 5, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> I attended and the majority of the discussion centered on whether the
> problem could be solved with a simpler model such as a FIB per provider.
> Fred pointed out that this would not handle overlapping source subnets and
> the fact that it was possible to solve the general problem with a Patricia
> tree and the installation disambiguating routes. Alvaro also commented
> that there are use cases beyond homenet. As you'd expect, the next step
> was that there needs to be more discussion on the RTG WG list (copied).
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On 11/4/13 11:05 PM, "Mark Townsley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Was anyone on this list able to attend the rtgwg meeting today where Fred
>> presented draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases-00? I missed it,
>> and would be interested in the reaction, feedback, or next steps (if any).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> - Mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> homenet mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
> 

----------------------------------------------------
The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially. 
   - Marshall McLuhan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to