Sure. Thanks -Pushpasis
From: Uma Chunduri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:25 PM To: Pushpasis Sarkar; Alia Atlas; Stephane Litkowski Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Chris Bowers Subject: RE: WG Adoption Call for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection Pushpasis, You said - [Pushpasis] The real motivation behind node-protection has been to protect traffic against node-failures of the 1-hop immediate neighbors. IMO, this can be achieved in two ways only. 1. Deploy node-protection on PLR, Or 2. Deploy NSR/GR on all 1-hop neighbors. ..For networks where NSR is already deployed, node-protection may not be that critical. [Pushpasis] Yes LFA manageability is optional, but if you donot need it then you also donot need to collect the path characteristics It's good we agree upon these 2 points in he discussion. I think for the benefit of future readers you ought to capture these 2 points in the draft. -- Uma C.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
