Hi All,

We have addressed all of the pending comments in the latest version of this 
draft. Request you all to review and provide feedback. 

Also we would like to re-call for WG adoption for this draft and take it 
forward as a WG document (as was decided in last IETF meeting).

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:59 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde; Harish Raghuveer; Shraddha Hegde; Hannes Gredler; Harish 
Raghuveer; Stephane Litkowski; Chris Bowers; Pushpasis Sarkar; Chris Bowers; 
Pushpasis Sarkar; Hannes Gredler; Stephane Litkowski
Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
has been successfully submitted by Pushpasis Sarkar and posted to the IETF 
repository.

Name:           draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Revision:       05
Title:          Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
Document date:  2014-06-24
Group:          rtgwg
Pages:          16
URL:            
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection/
Htmlized:       
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05
Diff:           
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-05

Abstract:
   The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA
   [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa] specification gaurantees only link-
   protection.  The resulting Remote-LFA nexthops (also called PQ-
   nodes), may not gaurantee node-protection for all destinations being
   protected by it.

   This document describes procedures for determining if a given PQ-node
   provides node-protection for a specific destination or not.  The
   document also shows how the same procedure can be utilised for
   collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths.
   Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate path is
   precursory to apply operator defined policy for eliminating paths not
   fitting constraints.


                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to