> hi antoni,
>
> i am all for accepting it as a WG item - IMO its an excellent proofpoint that
> really large datacenters can be run based on exisiting protocols and
[Tony said] Hannes, yepp, first, work's interesting & fact that it works gives
it its own merit, should be possibly taken up by someone IMO. My points were
though:
1. I didn't see 'running large datacenters' as something on RTGWG
charter and it's also typically something that is first driven by larger set of
requirements rather than a single datapoint.
2. A blueprint of a particular solution is exactly that. It is not a
generic protocol specification or guideline that will fit e'one. If you have
multi-TS which bring their own existing addresses or need MAC mobility or have
to run L2 applications or don't have BGP implementation with necessary twists
or other tid-nits which tons of DC happen to carry about then the shoe may not
fit.
> even getting to 10000s of routing nodes is not the end of the world.
>
[Tony said] We know that from a running thing called the 'Internet' ;-P I
know I took it out the context but I couldn't resist the tongue-in-cheek pun
possible ;-)
Again, looking fwd' to presentation and discussion on the floor.
--- tony
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
