Uma, Can I take your comments as a positive vote to adoption of the draft by rtgwg?
Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Jul 31, 2014, at 9:03 PM, "Uma Chunduri" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Authors, > >> This I-D is a bit of an architecture and a bit an applicability statement. >> It spans quite a lot of IETF technology. > > Indeed. > This covers quite a bit and offers lot of pointers for controller > architecture in SDN paradigm. This in general answers lot of open questions > in controller space and stitch gaps (relevant in IETF space).. > After SDN RG presentation, I talked to Daniel offline and any code > contributions to ODL (beyond OF) will accelerate the adoption much faster and > this architecture provides good guidance. > > -- > Uma C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 10:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Call for review draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture > > Hi, > > The authors of draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture are in the process of > requesting AD-sponsored publication of draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture > > This I-D is a bit of an architecture and a bit an applicability statement. It > spans quite a lot of IETF technology. > > The last call will obviously pop out sometime, but it would be nice to have > review comments before then. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
