Hi rtgwg,
freshly submitted & soliciting for feedback are the following drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-routing-extra-qualifiers/?include_text=1 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/?include_text=1 These are distilled version of the SADR stuff that has been coming in from homenet; they describe the hop-by-hop forwarding behaviour independent of the dynamic routing protocol du jour. The first one describes general considerations of adding things ("extra qualifiers") to destination longest-match, the second one does the specifics for source match. They're derived from baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing, and are essentially write-ups of e-mail threads with Fred. (Thanks!) These are -00, so there's a lot of things to be fixed still (I'm not even sure whether this should be 2 drafts or 1, and some bits should be moved from -dst-src to -extra-qualifiers if it stays separate.) I believe rtgwg is the "best" wg for this, looking at the charter this fits "Enhancements to hop-by-hop distributed routing", though admittedly it's neither FRR nor LFA. I'll happily accept a redirect to another wg (6man? homenet?) if that's deemed more appropriate. Last but not least, I'd like to request a slot at the IETF 91 rtgwg meeting to present these drafts. Cheers & Thanks in advance for feedback, -David _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
