Stephane, On 23/11/2014 08:47, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Uma, > > >Is this because of domain wide deployment requirements MRT brings-in > (as elaborated by Stewart?) or you are ok with LFA/rLFA coverage in > the network? > > No, domain-wide deployment is not an issue. The issue I see in MRT > (for my use case) is unoptimality of the FRR path (at least using > lowpoint algorithm). But anyway, as I mentioned, I'm not opposed to > make MRT progressing at all. It's good to have multiple tools.
While MRT may result in "unoptimality of the FRR path", why this unoptimality really matters that much, given that FRR suppose to be used for only a short period of time until IGP convergence? Yakov. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
