Hi Everyone, Just posted an updated version with few additions. Request you all to please review it and provide your valuable feedback.
Thanks and Regards, -Pushpasis On 2/20/15, 7:59 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-01.txt >has been successfully submitted by Pushpasis Sarkar and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa >Revision: 01 >Title: LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes >Document date: 2015-02-20 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 10 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix- >lfa-01.txt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa >/ >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-01 >Diff: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa >-01 > >Abstract: > This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms > to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes. In > particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be > used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed > prefixes. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating > potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. > > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
