On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:41:26AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > > On 8/26/15, 2:40 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > > > >> > Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor > >> > models!) will be based on something more technical than the fact that > >> > a group of people "really like it" some other way. > >> > >> I'm equally unsure that having an argument of "I got there first" is a > >> compelling argument given the number of folks (including vendors) who > >> have stated willingness (or even support) for change. I think having a > >> major class of users stand up and say this is important should garner > >> some notice. > > > >Please keep in mind that we are talking about several published > >proposed standards that have been implemented and deployed. I think > >there must be convincing technical reasons to declare them broken and > >to redo them. > > Other than adding /device at the top, we are not obsoleting RFC 7223. The > current device model keeps the interfaces configuration silo and merely > augments it with a binding to the logical-networking-element. >
For the sake of clarity, these are the YANG data models that are published as Proposed Standard RFCs: - RFC 6022 NETCONF Monitoring - RFC 6536 NETCONF Access Control Model - RFC 7223 Interface Management - RFC 7277 IP Management - RFC 7317 System Management - RFC 7407 SNMP Configuration I see text in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 that seems to affect pretty much all of them. I also do not see "augments it (RFC 7223) with a binding to the logical-networking-element" in the YANG fragment in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
