On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > > Hopefully, a decision to change all existing models (including vendor > > models!) will be based on something more technical than the fact that > > a group of people "really like it" some other way. > > I'm equally unsure that having an argument of "I got there first" is a > compelling argument given the number of folks (including vendors) who > have stated willingness (or even support) for change. I think having a > major class of users stand up and say this is important should garner > some notice.
Please keep in mind that we are talking about several published proposed standards that have been implemented and deployed. I think there must be convincing technical reasons to declare them broken and to redo them. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
