Hi everyone,

2015-12-18, Loa Andersson:
Let me know if there is any support I can give from the bottom of my
mpls well.

This comment is a good opportunity to highlight the fact that MPLS/GRE and MPLS/UDP are part of various service layer tunnels used for overlays.

I will go as far as to suggest that these encaps should be explicitely called out in the DT charter (more than through "other technologies").

Best,

-Thomas



On 2015-12-17 03:33, Alia Atlas wrote:
Based on the presentation by Greg Mirsky and discussion in rtgwg and
elsewhere, I have decided to charter a fast-moving Routing Area design
team to work on Overlay OAM.

The charter is below:

     In the Routing Area, several WGs (e.g. NVO3, BIER, and SFC) are
     working on relatively new encapsulations to create overlays. These
     overlay or service encapsulations are transport-independent since
     they may be over different transports or at different layers in the
     networking stack. Each WG is starting to discuss what OAM and tools
     need to be developed (see draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-00,
     draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-00, and individual drafts in NVO3).
     With increasing use of overlay and service layer tunnels, extensions
     to traceroute to allow visibility into multiple layers are being
     discussed (e.g. draft-nordmark-nvo3-transcending-traceroute-01).

     There is an opportunity to propose protocols and methods to provide
     Overlay OAM in a sufficiently generic fashion that they can meet the
     requirements and be applied to at least BIER, NSH, VXLAN-GPE,
     GENEVE, and GUE. A truly successful result would also be applicable
     to other technologies.

     This Design Team is chartered to first produce a brief gap analysis
     and requirements document to focus its work on protocol extensions.
     This should be published by March 2016. With that basis, this Design
     Team is chartered to rapidly propose extensions to existing IETF OAM
     protocols such as those discussed in [RFC 7276] and new ones to
     support the requirements for OAM from NVO3, BIER, and SFC. The
     Design Team will produce an initial proposal by IETF 95. It is
     expected that the initial proposal will provide guidance to
     additional people who will be interested in working on the details
     and gaps.

     The Design Team will consider the preliminary OAM requirements from
     NVO3, BIER, and SFC. The Design Team should align with the LIME WG's
     work on common YANG models of OAM.

The members of the design team are:
     Greg Mirsky (DT lead)
     Ignas Bagdonas
     Erik Nordmark
     Carlos Pignataro
     Mach Chen
     Santosh Pallagatti
     Deepak Kumarde
     David Mozes
     Nagendra Kumar Nainar

The design team has a private mailing list that will be publicly archived.
The mailing list is [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.

The design team will also use a wiki to track some information.  Others
are also welcome to comment and interact there.
The wiki is at: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgOoamDT

Regards,
Alia




_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to