Lou I think that it is difficult, perhaps impossible, to review this I-D until the foundations on which it is based, mount and op-state, become firmer.
I track the discussions on the netmod WG list (and have done so since before it existed!) and do not expect either of those two issues to settle down in the immediate future. Some aspects of YANG get agreed quickly, others do not, and I see these two in the latter camp. So for me, the way to progress this I-D would be to join the netmod list and advance those two topics. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> To: "Routing WG" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 2:59 PM > FYI - This has been out a little bit, but haven't seen any comments. > We'd definitely like to hear from the WG on this. > > quoting the draft: > This version is a major > change from the prior version and this change was enabled by the work > on the previously mentioned Structural Mount/YSDL. > > Note that an interim on Structural Mount/YSDL (which I think of > generally as 'schema mount') has been scheduled by the netmod WG -- see > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15257.html and > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15260.html > > Lou > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02.txt > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:16:07 -0800 > From: [email protected] > Reply-To: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : Network Device YANG Organizational Models > Authors : Acee Lindem > Lou Berger > Dean Bogdanovic > Christan Hopps > Filename : draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02.txt > Pages : 36 > Date : 2016-01-22 > > Abstract: > This document presents an approach for organizing YANG models in a > comprehensive structure that may be used to configure and operate > network devices. The structure is itself represented as a YANG > model, with all of the related component models logically organized > in a way that is operationally intuitive, but this model is not > expected to be implemented. The identified component modules are > expected to be defined and implemented on common network devices. > > This document also defines two modules that can be used to model the > logical and virtual resource representations that may be present on a > network device. Examples of common industry terms for logical > resource representations are Logical Systems or Routers. Examples of > of common industry terms for virtual resource representations are > Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances and Virtual Switch > Instances (VSIs). > > This document is derived from work submitted to the IETF by members > of the informal OpenConfig working group of network operators and is > a product of the Routing Area YANG Architecture design team. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
