Greg,

We think these two drafts belong in the BFD working group.  As a result, we did 
not allocate any time to discuss these drafts in RTGWG in Buenos Aires.

The tentative agenda can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-rtgwg

Thanks,
Chris

From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 5:08 PM
To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <[email protected]>; Chris Bowers 
<[email protected]>; rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; Routing WG 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RTGWG presentation slot requests for Buenos Aires

Hi Jeff,
apologize for the belated update. The two new drafts, 
draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip-00
draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls-00, been submitted and I've asked chairs for 
15 minutes slot to present and discuss this work.
Greatly appreciate your review, comments and suggestions.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Jeffrey Haas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:01:51PM -0700, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> we were not certain where these proposals would fit as there's no changes
> proposed to the BFD mechanism. The discussion is on the transport,
> encapsulation of BFD control packet.
>
> Always open to suggestions and greatly appreciate your consideration.

Off the cuff, I'd say the work was appropriate to BFD.  Mostly, I think it's
just a bit unfair to hit RTGWG with something that required more than a
casual bit of background (BFD on LAG) to have an opinion on.  Of course, I
leave that final determination to the RTGWG chairs.

For the scope of the documents, I would normally suggest to just start on
the BFD mail list and get a bit of discussion going there.  The work is,
IMO, clearly in charter for BFD and a reasonable candidate for quick
adoption and closure if there's implementation work.  As I mentioned, it's
very minor surgery to the existing mechanism.

> PS. Drafts just been uploaded today.

I think one other item you might run afoul of is rtgwg prefers there be some
list discussion before presentation slots get assigned.  But that's the
chairs' prerogative.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to