That or we could also rename it to protocol-key-chain to disambiguate it
from system-key-chain.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote:

> So hopefully we’ve put the issue of combining the module to bed for good…
> If look at the date nodes for these two models, it is patently clear that
> these serve two different purposes.
>
> What about the naming issue? I got a comment that I should take “routing-“
> back out due to the fact that this is what that these key-chains can be
> used for many non-routing purposes. For example, BFD -
> http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.2/topics/reference/configuration-statement/key-chain-edit-security-authentication-key-chains.html
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Acee Lindem <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 6:04 PM
> To: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>
> Cc: Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]>, Tom Petch <[email protected]>, "
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>, Routing WG <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] mbj review of
> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-server-model-09
>
>
>
> From: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 4:43 PM
> To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kent Watsen <[email protected]>, Tom Petch <[email protected]>,
> Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
> Routing WG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] mbj review of
> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-server-model-09
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I did get some negative feedback with respect to adding “routing-“ to the
> model name since key chains are used for other non-routing applications as
> well.
>
>
> One of those non-routing protocols is BFD. I am fine if the model is
> called protocol-key-chain, but I wonder what happens the next entity
> needing key-chain is not a protocol.
>
> The bigger question in my mind is, are these really different types of
> key-chains models, or are we talking about one key-chain model?
>
>
> The rtgwg key chain model is the one we all know and love associated with
> the graceful rollover of configurable keys. The netconf model is list of
> certificates for a public key. Please look at the information content of
> the two models. I hope I don’t have to answer this question again ;^)
>
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>


-- 
Mahesh Jethanandani
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to