Hi Huub,
thank you for your interest in these documents and the questions.
Frankly, I don't have an example of passive FM among ITEF-developed OAM tools.
Distinction between proactive and on-demand may be subjective if we consider
how a Measurement Agent from LMAP framework executes measurement tasks, i.e.
performs PM operation, based on pre-defined schedule. Is that proactive or
on-demand PM operation? Perhaps such distinction is unnecessary but we used
these categories because traditionally we refer to ping and traceroute to be
on-demand while BFD as proactive OAM.
What would you suggest?
Regards,
Greg
From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 7:56 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; BIER
([email protected]); [email protected]
Cc: Ignas Bagdonas ([email protected]); Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
([email protected]); Erik Nordmark ([email protected]); [email protected];
Petr Lapukhov ([email protected]); [email protected]; Alia Atlas
([email protected]); Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) ([email protected]); David
Mozes ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT
Dear Greg,
You wrote:
the design team had published two documents:
* Overlay OAM Requirements
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00
* OAM for Overlay Networks: Gap Analysis
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-00
Both documents have subsections pro-active and on-demand for FM
but active and passive for PM.
Why is there no distinction made for active and passive FM,
and pro-active and on-demand for PM?
Best regards, Huub.
--
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
